Tuesday, March 6, 2012

The 7 - size Intervention - A Holistic Diathesis-Stress approach to Stress-Management

Developing a Systematic Psychosocial Stressor estimation Process utilizing the 7-Dimensional Psycho-social Stressor inventory (7D-Psi)

Can stress alone cause us to design physical and mental disorders?

Mental Illness Statistics

Diathesis-Stress Model

The 7 - size Intervention - A Holistic Diathesis-Stress approach to Stress-Management

Discourse in the Social Sciences: Strategies for Translating Models of Mental Illness (Contributions in Sociology) Best

Rate This Product :


Discourse in the Social Sciences: Strategies for Translating Models of Mental Illness (Contributions in Sociology) Overview

The authors consider the nature of explanatory models in the social sciences in order to suggest ways in which conceptual systems differ. They suggest that, in many cases, theorists, researchers and clinicians can utilize insights from "rival" models in building their own models, without sacrificing the integrity of their own work.


Customer Reviews




*** Product Information and Prices Stored: Mar 06, 2012 14:31:02

Researchers have proposed that many disorders are believed to design when some kind of stressor affects a man who already has a vulnerability or diathesis for that disorder (Ingram & Luxton, 2005; Meehl, 1962; Monroe & Simons, 1991). The diathesis or vulnerabilty which could be a genetic predisposition or adverse childhood palpate is not commonly sufficient to cause the disorder itself, but it is a contributory factor. For example, a child who experiences the death of a parent would be at a higher risk to design depression as an adult. In this case the vulnerability itself was a childhood stressor.

So then experiencing psycho-social stressors may not be a sufficient cause to design disorders, but the two added together - genetic predisposition and/ or adverse childhood palpate plus (+) current stressors are sufficient causes for the amelioration of diseases, disorders, and abnormal behavior in general. Since vulnerabilities and stressors may exist on a continuum, for example ranging from one (1) low to ten (10) high, individuals that have high levels of vulnerabilities may only need low levels of current stressors in their life to design disorders. Likewise, individuals with high levels of psycho-social stressors may only need low levels of diatheses (adverse childhood experiences and/ or genetic predispositions) for clear disorders to develop.

This description will introduce the 7 size Intervention - a unique stress-management estimation process. It will discuss the utilization of the following three instruments - to systematically document and help a client with visualizing their childhood vulnerabilities, current life stressors, and current clear activities that they are participating in to decrease stress, build resiliency, and enhance their farranging wellness to hopefully motivate them to design and monitor a condition and wellness plan for their lives:

1. Adverse Childhood Experiences (Ace) Questionnaire
2. 7 Dimensional - Psycho-social Stressor inventory (7D-Psi)
3. 7 Dimensional - Therapeutic activity observe (7D-Tas)

What is the Ace Study?

The Adverse Childhood Experiences (Ace) Study is one of the largest investigations ever conducted on the links between childhood maltreatment and later-life condition and well-being. As a collaboration between the Centers for Disease control and stoppage and Kaiser Permanente's condition estimation Clinic in San Diego, condition Maintenance society (Hmo) members undergoing a farranging physical examination in case,granted detailed facts about their childhood palpate of abuse, neglect, and house dysfunction. Over 17,000 members chose to participate. To date, over 50 scientific articles have been published and over 100 conference and workshop presentations have been made.

The Ace Study findings propose that these experiences are major risk factors for the prominent causes of illness and death as well as poor ability of life in the United States. Develop in preventing and recovering from the nation's worst condition and collective problems is likely to advantage from the comprehension that many of these problems arise as a consequence of adverse childhood experiences.

What's an Ace score? Growing up experiencing any of the following conditions in the household prior to age 18 identifies your Ace score (1 point for each one):

Recurrent physical abuse
Recurrent emotional abuse
Contact sexual abuse
An alcohol and/or drug abuser in the household
An incarcerated household member
Someone who is chronically depressed, mentally ill, institutionalized, or suicidal
Mother is treated violently
One or no parents
Emotional neglect
Physical neglect

The Ace score can be used to quantify your childhood adverse experiences and vulnerabilities, and the score can be documented on the "Wheel of Life," to visualize a client's stress tolerance zone.

What is the significance of the Ace study?

Because adverse childhood experiences (Aces) are very common, and Aces are strong predictors of condition risks and disease from adolescence to adulthood - the mixture of these findings makes Aces one of the leading, if not the prominent determinant of the condition and collective well-being of our nation.

Identifying Psych-social Stressors

"The Dsm-Iv-Tr informs us that Axis Iv is for reporting psychosocial and environmental problems that may influence the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of mental disorders delineated on Axes I and Ii. A psychosocial or environmental problem may be a negative life event, an environmental mystery or deficiency, a familial or other interpersonal stress, an inadequacy of collective hold or personal resources, or other problem associated to the context in which a person's difficulties have developed. When a individual has complicated psychosocial or environmental problems, the clinician may note as many as are judged to be relevant," (Dsm-Iv-Tr, p. 31).

Unfortunately, clinicians rarely conduct a multi-dimensionally farranging systematic investigation of their client's psychosocial stressors to document those stressors that may be principal to the prognosis and medicine planning process. The 7D - Psi was developed specifically for this purpose.

7 Dimensional - Psycho-social Stressor inventory (7D-Psi)

The 7 - Dimensional Psychosocial inventory (7d-Psi) is an efficient and efficient 170-item psychosocial stressors tool that facilitates the farranging and systematic estimation of an individual's stressful life experiences.  The purpose of identifying as complete a list as possible, of an individual's psychosocial stressors, is so that a medicine plan can be developed that will address the most prominent of those factors.  This formula enhances the use of resources.  It also can help with and enhance the Dsm-Iv-Tr, Axis Iv (Psychosocial Stressor) diagnosis. The 7D-Psi targets the adult population, but it can be modified to be used with adolescents.  The 170 items can really be assessed within 15 minutes.  It is really scored, and the results can be swiftly integrated into a 7 - Dimensional Wheel of Life to be viewed by the client as a motivational enhancement. In addition to the 7 D - Psi's effectiveness in targeting the most prominent psycho-social stressors needing attention, it has the potential to recognize differential former diagnoses for supplementary evaluation. The 7 D - Psi's brevity, ease of administration and scoring make it highly useful for explore applications. Based on independent interviews by a mental condition professional, this inventory administered by former care practitioners' demonstrated good accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for identifying psycho-social stressors principal to prognosis and medicine planing. medicine outcome studies are presently in process (Slobodzien, 2005).

Protective Factors

Protective factors in childhood or influences that may modify a child's reaction or response to a stressor must also be carefully in the equation. These protective factors such as having a house environment in childhood in which at least one one parent was supportive and a good attachment connection between parent and child was developed can protect against the harmful effects of an abusive parent (Masten & Coatsworth, 1998). Other childhood protective factors that can protect against a range of stressors contain having an easygoing temperament, high self-esteem, high intelligence, and school achievement (Masten, 2001; Masten & Coatsworth, 1998; Rutter, 1987).

Building Resiliency

So, what is a man to do if they should fall in the category of having high levels of childhood vulnerabilities (diatheses); having had low levels of childhood protective factors; and currently having high levels of psycho-social stressors in their life. How do population cope with serious illnesses, the loss of a job, the death of a loved one, or other life sharp events and/ or traumatic experiences? Should you just give up and give into the symptoms that you are already developing. Is it clear or just fate that you will design these disorders, or is their something that you can start doing for yourself now to decrease your risk?

Since stress is defined by some experts as the response or palpate of an individual to demands that he or she perceives as taxing or exceeding his or her personal resources (Folkman & Moskovitz, 2004; Lazarus, 1993; Taylor & Stanton, 2007), it is logical to think that we could growth our personal resources to build resiliency in all the dimensions of our lives - to decrease the risk of developing these disorders and their harmful consequences. Resilience is the ability to recover from or adjust really to change or misfortune. To be resilient means to be flexible, elastic, and springy. In other words, when bad things happen to you, you are carefully to be resilient when you are able to bounce back and adapt successfully to very difficult circumstances.

There is addition evidence that if a child's basic systems of adaptation (such as intelligence and cognitive development, ability to self-regulate, motivation to perform mastery, efficient parenting, and well-functioning neurobiological systems for handling stress) are operating normally, then most threatening circumstances will have minimal impact on him or her (Masten, 2001). Problems may arise when a serious stressor damages one or more of these systems or when the level of challenge far exceeds human capacity to adapt (e.g., exposure to lasting trauma in war or lasting maltreatment in abusive families (Cicchetti, 2004; Cicchetti & Toth, 2005; Masten & Coatsworth, 1998). Resilience is not a personality trait that population are born with. It is an ability that can be learned and developed in anyone. Resilience can be systematically built multi-dimensionally into many areas of your life by developing a holistic condition and wellness plan. The following Therapeutic activity observe can be utilized to compare an individuals current behaviors/ activities associated to decreasing stress, building resiliency, and improving over-all wellness.

7 Dimensional - Therapeutic activity observe (7D-Tas)

The 7D-Tas is a 21 quiz, observe that can recognize definite therapeutic activities in the following seven life-functioning dimensions:

1. Medical/ physical Stress - Dimension
2. Self-regulation/ Impulse control Stress - size
3. Educational/ Occupational Stress - size
4. Social/ Cultural Stress - size
5. Financial/ Legal Stress - size
6. Mental/ Emotional Stress - size
7. Spiritual/ Religious Stress - Dimension

The following three questions are asked:

1. Are you currently participating in activities that will decrease stress, build resiliency, and enhance your farranging wellness in in each of the 7 dimensions?
2. If Yes - What definite activities are you participating in for at least 30 minutes per day?
3. How many days per month are you participating in these activities?

Six of the seven dimensions are common to most condition and wellness models, but the second dimension: Self-regulation/ Impulse control may require some explanation, so I will list the following second size questions for consideration:

Self-regulation/ Impulse control Dimension:

1. Are you currently maintaining a balanced lifestyle by avoiding alcohol/ drug abuse and/ or other addictive/ high-risk behaviors (e.g., gambling, sexual compulsive behaviors, food - binging/ purging, obsessive religious practices, risky/ perilous behaviors - speeding/ reckless driving, and/ or assaults/ violence/ self-harm, immoderate - internet use shopping, exercise, work activities, etc.). Yes/ No
2. If Yes - Circle the following activities that you are participating in: self-monitoring, daily journaling, talk to house members/ friends, sponsor/ peer coach, read self-help books, attend hold groups (religious meetings, Alcoholics Anonymous), individual/ group counseling/ therapy, etc. Other: _____________
3. If Yes - Circle the amount of Days per Month: 0 --- 5 --- 10 --- 15 --- 20 --- 25 --- 30

Total percentage (%) scores are then tallied and can then be documented on a "Wheel of Life" to be visualized to emphasize the cognitive dissonance between what you (or your client) are really doing to enhance your life at this time and what you think you may be doing.

Self-regulation is one of the major administrative functions of the human brain and is a centrally prominent process and life-functioning dimension. Not only does it hold prominent keys to self theory, but it also has farranging pragmatic applications. Indeed, the majority of personal and collective problems faced by modern Western citizens - addiction, violence and crime, debt, sexually transmitted diseases, underachievement, unwanted pregnancy, obesity, failure to exercise, gambling, failure to save money, and others - are rooted in failures of self-regulation (Higgins, E. T., 1996).

Putting It All Together

Guidelines for implementing a 7 size Intervention:

1. Start the interview with the "Open question" technique to elicit as much detailed facts as potential from the client, prior to administering any questionnaires or checklists (Utilize reflective listening skills, etc.).
2. Administer the Ace questions and guess the Ace score.
3. Administer the 7D - Psi and guess scores.
4. Administer the 7D - Tas and guess scores and plot all scores on the Wheel of Life to visualize the diathesis levels, current psycho-social stressor levels, and the current efforts to decrease stress and build resiliency.
5. Administer the "Stages of Change" question: On a scale of 1 to 10 - with 10 representing the top motivation for change that you have at this time, how motivated are you?

Pre-contemplation Stage = 1 - 3
Contemplation Stage = 4 - 5
Preparation Stage = 6 - 7
Action Stage = 8 - 9
Maintenance Stage = 10

6. Supply a "Motivational Interviewing" session with your client discussing the "Stages of Change." The brevity of this description does not allow for an overview of this session (Tomlin, K. & Richardson, H., 2004)
7. design a holistic multidimensional condition and wellness plan and a farranging individualized medicine plan if principal along with a case administration and medicine monitoring system.

7 - Dimensional Model

In the "Addictions rescue measurement law (Arms)," (Slobodzien, J. 2005), the following seven life-functioning therapeutic activity dimensions for Develop outcome measurements contain the 7D-Psi. Each of the seven dimensions has individualized estimation criteria:

1. Medical/ physical Stress - Dimension
2. Self-regulation/ Impulse control Stress - size
3. Educational/ Occupational Stress - size
4. Social/ Cultural Stress - size
5. Financial/ Legal Stress - size
6. Mental/ Emotional Stress - size
7. Spiritual/ Religious Stress - Dimension

The 7 - size model was initially designed to quantum inpatient Develop by assessing therapeutic life-functioning activities, however explore may prove it to be efficient as a generalized model for recovery, from all pathological diseases, disorders, and disabilities. It's multidimensional assessment/ medicine process includes the internal interconnection of complicated dimensions from biomedical to spiritual - taking into inventory the effects of feedback and the existence of each size mutually influencing each other simultaneously. Because of the complexity of human nature, medicine Develop needs to be initially tailored and guided by an individualized medicine plan based on a farranging bio-psychosocial estimation that identifies definite problems, goals, objectives, methods, and timetables for achieving the goals and objectives of treatment.

Psycho-social stressors may influence many domains of an individual's functioning and require holistic condition and wellness planning along with multi-modal treatment. Goals of medicine contain allowance in multi-dimensional stress, and simultaneous revision in multi-dimensional functioning. Real Develop requires time, commitment, and discipline in reasoning about it, planning for it, working the plan, and monitoring the successes made to growth resilience. It also requires appropriate interventions and motivating strategies for each Develop area of an individual's life.

7 - Dimensions is a nonlinear, dynamical, non-hierarchical model that focuses on interactions between complicated risk factors and situational determinants similar to catastrophe and chaos theories in predicting and explaining addictive behaviors and relapse. complicated influences trigger and control within high-risk situations and influence the global multidimensional functioning of an individual. The process of building resilience incorporates the interaction between many background factors (e.g., house history, collective support, and co morbid psychopathology), physiological states, cognitive processes (e.g., self-efficacy, motivation, outcome expectancies), and coping skills. To put it simply, small changes in an individual's behavior can ensue in large qualitative changes at the global level and patterns at the global level of a law emerge solely from numerous petite interactions. The clinical utility of the 7 - Dimensions rescue model is in its ability to help condition care providers to swiftly obtain detailed facts about an individual's personality, background, substance use history, affective state, self-efficacy, and coping skills for prognosis, diagnosis, medicine planning, and outcome measures.

The 7 - Dimensions' law promotes a synergistically clear ensue that can ignite and set free the human spirit when an individual's life functioning dimensions are elevated in a homeostatic system. The reciprocity between spirituality and multidimensional life functioning progress, design the deepest intrinsic self-image and behavioral changes.

The basic 7 - Dimensions law purports that the mixture of an individuals' elevated and balanced complicated life-functioning dimensions can produce a synergistically tenacious, resilient, and spiritually clear individual homeostasis. Just as the mixture of alcohol and drugs (for example valium) when taken together produce a synergistic ensue (potency effects are not added together, but multiplied), and can design into an addiction or unbalanced life-style, clear medicine effectiveness and prosperous outcomes are the ensue of a synergistic connection with "The Higher Power."

Conclusion

A rapidly growing body of evidence supports the connection between adverse childhood experiences and physical/ mental disorders. Clinical explore investigating this connection concludes that psychosocial stressors in childhood combined with current stressors can be both a cause and a consequence of mental disorders. Furthermore, new data have shown that condition and wellness planning to decrease stress and build resiliency might sacrifice the symptoms that lead up to mental disorders.

Unfortunately, the influence of psychosocial stressors upon mental disorders remains underrecognized compared to former genetic-biologic causes. Mental condition providers should perform systematic screening for psychosocial stressors to recognize potential symptoms for supplementary prognosis and medicine planning. Considerations should be given to developing unique interventions to help patients with becoming aware of the connections between their lifestyle activities and hereafter mental condition disorders. The mixture of screening devices discussed in this description to help patients visualize their childhood vulnerabilities, current stressors, and current therapeutic activities have successfully motivated patients to implement clear therapeutic activities to target definite stressors affecting singular dimensions of their lives to decrease stress, build resiliency, and enhance their farranging wellness. The 7 size Intervention has been particularly useful in patients with substance abuse disorders occurring with other lasting diseases.

The time has come for mental condition providers to recognize the impact of a seven dimensional coming to mental health. The 7 - Dimensions Model is not claiming to be the panacea for the ills of all mankind, but it is a step in the right direction for getting clinicians to change the way they practice, by changing medicine installation systems to merge evidence-based explore findings on efficient interventions. The challenge for those interested in conducting outcome evaluations to enhance their ability of care is to merge a law that will standardize their estimation procedures, medicine programs, and clinical medicine practices. By diligently following a standardized law to obtain base-line outcome statistics of their medicine program effectiveness despite the outcome, they will be able to compare the effectiveness of subsequent medicine interventions.

For more info see: Poly-Behavioral Addiction and the Addictions rescue measurement law (Arms) at: http://ezinearticles.com/?expert_bio=James_Slobodzien

by James Slobodzien, Psy.D.

References
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, Dc, American Psychiatric Association, 2000, p. 787 & p. 731.
Cicchetti, D. (2004), An odyssey of dicovery: Lessons learned through three decades of explore on child maltreatment. Amer. Psychol., 731-41
Cicchetti, D., Toth, S.L. (2005). Child maltreatment, annual spin of Clinical Psychology, 1 (1), 409-38.
Folkman, S. & Moskovitz, J. T. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu.Rev. Psychol., 55. 745-74.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). The "self digest": Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and collective Psychology, 71, 1062-1083. Ingram, R.E. & Luxton, D.D. (2005). Vulnerability - Stress Models. In B. J. Hankin & J.R.Z. Abela (Eds.), amelioration of psychopathology: A vulnerability-stress perspective (pp. 32-46). Thousand Oaks, C.A.: Sage.
Lazarus, R.S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. annual spin of psychology, 44, 1-21.
Masten, A.S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. Amer. Psychol., 56, 227-38.
Masten, A.S. & Coatsworth, J.D. (1998). The amelioration of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from explore in prosperous children. Amer. Psychol., 53, 205-20.
Meehl, P.E. (1962). Schizotaxia, schizotype, schizophrenia. Amer. Psychol., 17, 827-38.
Monroe, S.M., & Simons, A.D. (1991). Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: Implications for the depressed disorders. Psychol. Bull., 110, 406-25.
Rutter, M. (1987). Psychological resilience and protective mechanisms. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 51, 316-31.
Slobodzien, J. (2005). Poly-behavioral addiction and the addictions rescue measurement law (Arms). Booklocker.com. Inc., episode 7, p. 32.
Taylor, S.E. & Stanton, A.L. (2007). Coping resources, coping process, and mental health. annual spin of Clinical Psychology, 3. 377-401.
Tomlin, K. M. & Richardson, H. (2004), Motivational Interviewing & Stages of change - Integrating best practices for substance abuse professionals. Hazelton.

The 7 - size Intervention - A Holistic Diathesis-Stress approach to Stress-Management4 of 4 (CC) "An Introduction to Universal Design in Higher Education" part 4 Tube. Duration : 9.17 Mins.


This presentation by Roger O. Smith, PhD, OT, FAOTA, to a group of faculty at University of Wisconsin-LaCrosse, on April 24, 2008, includes an overview of Universal Design in Higher Education (UDE). The question, "Why universal design in education?" is answered with historical context and perspectives from current research.

Tags:

No comments:

Post a Comment